top of page

Welcome to the “Savvy Seller”
Shadow Seller’s stories that  simplify…

Welcome to Shadow Seller's blog, where we're all about ditching outdated sales methods for cutting-edge excellence. Here, we offer insights and strategies to boost the savvy of sales leaders, pros and CEOs. Dive into innovative sales tactics, bust myths, and discover hidden gems to streamline your workflow and enhance productivity. Our posts are packed with practical tips and real-world examples to shake up your sales approach. Whether you're a sales vet looking for an edge, a sales leader trying to finally overcome some of those repetitive problems or a CEO aiming for growth, you've found your resource. Join us on this journey to sales success and stay tuned for content on making sales simpler and more effective. Welcome aboard Shadow Seller's world

Trust isn't a warm, fuzzy ideal. It's the currency of every conversation. It’s the lubricant that keeps the commercial wheels turning. In B2B sales, one of the fastest ways to lose it is to show up to a prospect call, not just unprepared, but less prepared or ill-prepared.

That might sound harsh—but if we’re honest, we’ve all seen it. Sellers turn up asking questions they could’ve answered with ten minutes of desk research. They ask the prospect to walk them through the company background. The industry. Even the job title. The problems, the “what keeps up at night” routine.


And just like that, trust erodes. Quietly, but decisively.


It’s More than Sloppy. It’s Selfish.

When a seller shows up without doing the work, it signals one of two things:

  1. They couldn’t be bothered. They’ve prioritized their own time over the prospect’s. Instead of investing in understanding the buyer’s world, they’re hoping the buyer will bring them up to speed. This is an imposition on the prospect.

  2. They didn’t know how to meaningfully prepare. Maybe they don’t know where to look, what to look for, or how to connect the dots. The single biggest determining factor between great sellers and the rest is the ability to connect the dots from the prospect’s challenges or opportunities to your solution. But from the buyer’s perspective, it’s still a big miss.

Either way, the message is the same:

“You weren’t worth the effort.”

And that’s the moment the prospect tunes out.


The Modern Buyer Doesn’t Have Time for Your Discovery

Let’s face it—buyers are flooded. Their calendars are brutal. Their patience is short. If you’ve been lucky enough to get on their schedule, they’re hoping—expecting—that you’ll come with something meaningful to offer. An informed hypothesis. An observation they hadn’t considered. A point of view that shows you’ve been paying attention. They’re supposedly already 70% of the way through their buyer journey so when we say we have to “meet them in the moment” the least you can do is show up in the same moment!

That’s how trust is built now. Not by being likeable. By being useful.

And usefulness starts with preparation.


Preparation Is the First Demonstration of Respect

It says:

  • I value your time enough to do my homework.

  • I understand your world (and am brave enough) enough to offer a perspective.

  • I’ve earned the right to ask for yours in return.

That’s not just good manners. That’s trust-building behavior.


But Let’s Be Real—Prep Takes Time

The kind of insight-led preparation that earns trust? It’s not light lifting. And most sellers are drowning in admin, CRM updates, internal meetings, and quota pressure. So they cut corners. They go in cold. And they hope for magic.

That’s why we built Shadow—an AI sales readiness tool for the real world.

Shadow helps B2B sellers prepare faster and better. It surfaces relevant insights and synergies, builds context around your prospect’s world, and helps you shape a smart, tailored point of view—so you can show up not just informed, but trustworthy.

Because in today’s B2B landscape, the first ask isn’t for a meeting. It’s for trust. And you only get one shot to earn it.

 

 
 
 

Updated: Jun 10

Trust is the lubricant that eases the frictions of life and business…but now we’re just grinding our gears!
Trust is the lubricant that eases the frictions of life and business…but now we’re just grinding our gears!

Trust is one of those words everyone throws around—especially in B2B circles—but ask a dozen people what it really means, and you’ll get a dozen different answers (and half of them will contradict each other). The sad truth is that we all agree “trust matters,” yet we routinely break it, often without even realizing it. That irony becomes painfully clear when you dig into the little things—because, these days, everything really is a game of inches. But for all the nods to nuance, most revenue teams treat trust like a checkbox rather than something that demands constant care.


Why “Trust” Feels So Elusive

  • Everyone Talks, Few Understand


    We’ve all seen corporate mission statements blather on about “building trusted partnerships.” We spout it in sales pitches: “Our clients trust us.” Internally, we trot out trust as a KPI. Yet when push comes to shove, so many of us treat trust like an afterthought. The result? Clients feel betrayed, teams become cynical, and everyone ends up worse off.

  • Details Matter—Until They Don’t


    You’ll hear leaders preach, “It’s all about the details,” or “Success is a game of inches.” But when quotas and dashboards take center stage, details vanish. Promises are made (and broken), prospects are misled (even if unintentionally), and the “trust” we brag about evaporates, and we don’t seem to notice!


Listen to the Pod:


A Cautionary Tale from Maddie Bell Maddie Bell (CEO over at Scheduler AI) recently called this out on LinkedIn, spotlighting the dangers of poorly qualified (or downright bogus – my words) sales meetings. Revenue teams are so measured by and rewarded according to hit rates—number of meetings booked, demos delivered, SQLs created. Not surprisingly they’ll take a meeting with anyone who can fog a mirror.

That’s our first betrayal of trust. By agreeing to talk to someone who clearly doesn’t belong, or want to be, in our funnel, we’re telling prospects: “We care more about hitting our numbers than helping you solve a real problem.” We’ll come back to this.


Defining Trust: A Confident Relationship with the Unknown At its core, trust is about embracing uncertainty. It’s establishing a more confident relationship with the future. If I’m going to rely on you, I must believe you’ll do right by me when the unexpected happens.


The Two Pillars of Trust: Ability and Character It helps to break trust down into two main components: Ability and Character.


  1. Ability (Competence + Reliability)

    • Competence: Do you actually know how to cut the grass, or in our world, deliver on a complex software integration?

    • Reliability: Can I count on you to show up every Wednesday (or hit your project milestones) without fail?

 → Both are conditional. I might trust you to cut my grass every Wednesday, but I probably wouldn’t trust you to cut my hair!  


  1. Character (Benevolence + Integrity)

    • Benevolence: Will you put my interests on par with—or preferably ahead of—your own? In other words, do you genuinely care about my success, not just your commission/results/revenue/goal?

    • Integrity: Are you basically honest? If you say you’ll do something, will you?

 → Character is far more decisive than Ability. A technically brilliant partner who treats you like a number is far less trustworthy than a “good enough” partner who genuinely has your back.


Why Character Always Trumps (and Then Fuels) Ability Think of Character as the engine that powers Ability. If someone has the skills (competence) and shows up (reliability) but doesn’t care about your success (benevolence) or fudges the truth when it suits them (lack of integrity), trust implodes. In contrast, a vendor who might not be the absolute top expert—but who consistently tells you the truth, not just what they think you want to hear, —wins every time.


Back to BDRs Booking Bad Meetings: A Trust Meltdown BDR teams, measured and rewarded on “meetings set,” will chase any lead, no matter how irrelevant. Why? Because we’ve turned business development into an engineering problem: pour X contacts/leads into the top of the funnel, churn them through a process, and out pops Y “Sales Qualified Leads.” Numbers make neat PowerPoint slides, but they do zero for trust.

  • Prospect’s Trust Is Lost: When you schedule a call that’s obviously irrelevant, the prospect feels like you wasted their time. They walk away thinking, “These folks don’t care about my business. They only want my calendar.”

  • Sales Team’s Trust in BDRs Shatters: AEs get a set of meetings that look good on paper but are cluttered with unqualified leads. Suddenly, AEs start rolling their eyes at every “SQL” that comes their way. They don’t bother preparing, because they assume it’ll be another waste of time. Now the entire revenue machine grinds to a miserable halt.

This is a textbook case of promoting your interests (hitting meeting quota) above everyone else’s (prospect relevance and AE productivity). It’s a betrayal of benevolence: you’re not putting the prospect’s interests first, you’re putting yours.


The Ripple Effect of Betrayed Trust

  1. Prospect Disengagement: They ghost you or, worse, bad-mouth your company.

  2. Sales Team Cynicism: AEs become “meeting skeptics,” assuming every BDR lead is junk, so they don’t prepare which means they’re more likely to fumble the real ones as well.

Welcome to the culture of distrust. Trust is the lubricant that eases the frictions of life and business allowing them to run more smoothly…but now we’re just grinding our gears!


So, What Now? Building (and Keeping) Trust

  • Measure the Right Things: Instead of “meetings set,” track “meetings with a clear business outcome.” Reward BDRs who qualify ruthlessly, even if their numbers look lower.

  • Train for Character, Not Just Competence: Role-play scenarios where a “no” is the right answer. Celebrate BDRs who walk away from weak leads.

  • Foster Cross-Functional Respect: Get AEs and BDRs to collaborate on ideal customer profiles (ICPs), so qualifiers don’t feel like gatekeepers, and AEs see the value up front.

  • Embrace Transparent Communication: Encourage everyone to flag when a metric is pushing them to cut corners. If a BDR says, “I feel shaky about this appointment,” dig in rather than shrug it off.


A Final Warning: Greed and the VC/PE Factor There’s a more fundamental problem underpinning the whole mess: greed. Founders think they can launch a startup, raise VC or PE dollars, and cash out for millions in a few years. So they take investment capital from firms that only know one language: numbers.


Venture capital and private equity firms structure everything around hitting quarterly targets, scaling revenue at all costs, and pumping up “valuation multiples.” If your cap table is full of investors demanding 3× returns by next year, guess what happens? You’re incentivized to push numbers—any numbers—knowing full well that spreadsheets don’t care about trust, nuance, or genuine customer success. Until founders and their investors shift from a purely financial mindset to one that values trusting relationships as much as short-term metrics, this cycle of trust betrayal will never change.

 

 
 
 

Magnificent animals! But they represent the things that everybody thinks, but nobody wants to talk about!
Magnificent animals! But they represent the things that everybody thinks, but nobody wants to talk about!

The Other AI Elephant in the Room: Fear of Becoming Irrelevant

Some of the current conversations remind me of what I thought was a perplexing experience. We were at a lake house with friends, one of them had their two sons with them, both of whom were tenured with one of the big consulting companies. This was a year + ago, when AI and GPT had recently broken into the “mainstream.” Neither of these sons could have been less interested, or more dismissive of this new phenomenon, while their father and I were discussing it at length. I walked away wondering why? It occurred to me that with them both being in the “business of expertise” (consulting), did AI/GPT represent a threat in that it “democratized expertise?”


We’ve talked constantly about AI triggering job-loss anxiety. But there’s a quieter, more  unsettling fear haunting people: the dread of seeing your hard-won expertise suddenly available to anyone with a prompt.


Listen to the pod...





A recent MIT study (WSJ, Dec 2024) dropped a scary data point into the AI discussion: scientists who used a domain-trained model discovered 44 % more new materials—yet 82 % of them felt less satisfied with their work. One researcher summed up the dread: “I couldn’t help feeling that much of my education is now worthless.” When AI can compress a decade of PhD know-how into a click, expertise stops being a moat that defends your castle and starts feeling like a dried up river - a commodity. And this isn’t just about job loss; it’s about identity erosion. The very knowledge that once made you indispensable is now available to anyone with a prompt. That’s the other elephant nobody wants to acknowledge. It feels like the “castle of you” is under siege, and the protection afforded by “your moat of expertise” has been forded.


Why does this feel so personal?

Identity Threat

“My expertise is my personal brand; if a chatbot can replicate it, who am I?”

Investment Loss

Years of study, certifications, and on-the-job scars suddenly look like sunk costs.

Level Playing Field Panic

Junior employees or even customers can now access similar insight instantly, eroding status hierarchies.

 

 We all have to reframe this - What the WSJ Piece Actually Shows:


Productivity 🚀, Happiness 😬

AI boosted materials-discovery output by +44 % compounds, +39 % patent filings, +17 % prototypes

Top Guns Pull Further Ahead

Some researchers became 81 % more productive

Specialized, Domain-Trained AI Wins

BUT - The gains came from a bespoke materials-science model—not a generic ChatGPT bolt-on—hinting that contextual AI is where the real upside sits.

What next?

We’ve all been talking about the implications of AI (for a while now!) We liken it to other technology developments – various hardware, “off-the-shelf” software, the internet, mobile devices, and so on. We’re looking for parallels we can draw. Is it the same? Is it different? One pal of mine made the comparison with the dawn of spreadsheets in finance. He said that those who embraced Visi-Calc, Excel, Lotus 123, etc leapt ahead - what’s the difference with AI?


Context beats generality.”

Progress comes from purpose-built AI. Savvy people appreciate they must tailor tools, use their expertise to provide the much-needed context, not just toss ChatGPT links around.


Democratized expertise isn’t a death sentence—it’s a promotion.”

We need to evolve into more of a Sherpa role - veterans will preserve or move up the value chain by guiding interpretation, ethics, and strategy.              


Just because you know “what” to do, doesn’t mean you know “how” to do it.

GPT can tell you how to perform surgery. In our business it can tell you how to best conduct a sales call – but it will do neither for you. You still have to actually “do it” yourselves. And until your AI buys from my AI (whenever that is!) that’s the way it is.


I always use a football analogy – AI (in our case, Shadow) will get you 80 yards up the field to the opposition red zone – but you’re still going to have to punch the touchdown in yourselves!

 
 
 
bottom of page